Archives for category: Lunch Lady

In the news:

March 13, 2020 The Seattle Times

Inslee expands coronavirus K-12 school closure, 250-person gathering ban, across Washington

“…school districts here have begun planning for ways to get core services, such as food, to families.”

“…looking for ways to get meals to students in need, such as bussing meals to neighborhoods where lots of students live.”

 

March 13, 2020 WHSV

Schools scramble to feed students after coronavirus closures

Kiyana Esco needs free school lunches and breakfasts to feed her six children. But with schools shutting down over coronavirus concerns, she’s scrambling to pick up the meals, care for her kids and keep her job.”

Thank you WHSV, for acknowledging that we are talking about a federal free and reduced school breakfast and lunch program. The press often calls it a free lunch program. The average person, who has no kids in school may not realize that breakfast is also part of the program.

 

March 13, 2020 CNN

The coronavirus pandemic is closing schools. How will kids eat?

“But as other schools deliberate shutting their doors to slow the spread of the coronavirus, some parents may be left to wonder: If schools close, how will my child eat?

 

Former Lunch Lady here.

I do not object to public assistance programs. The press should make an effort to keep the public informed on how these programs are working.

Again, I am not against public assistance programs, but did the WWII generation rely heavily on public school districts to feed their kids?

100 years ago, did families rely on school districts to feed their children to such an extent that, if school was shut down, school districts would scramble to fill busses with food and send it out into the neighborhoods?

 

Voluntary action:

February 25 Fox News

Ohio church pays off lunch debt for students at 11 school districts

Love to see newspeople ask:

If a family’s household income level qualifies for free & reduced breakfast and lunch at school, wouldn’t they also qualify for various other publicly funded food assistance programs?

Do free and reduced breakfast and lunch meals consumed at school reduce what a family receives or qualifies for each month in publicly funded food assistance?

If school shuts down, does the family still qualify for publicly funded food assistance? If food assistance programs remain in place outside of school-why would children be at risk of going hungry?

If the programs aren’t working-let’s hear all about it.

Related:

Meaningful Work

 

Tax money-which some people intend to be used to help others via public assistance programs-also goes for bombing Iraq and Afghanistan.

Helping others by donating to churches or private charities, food banks, etc. can avoid these conflicts.

Donors are free to opt out if a charity misbehaves.

People could keep more of their own money to donate to causes of their choosing if the federal government was not taking it to pay for wasteful programs.

More here:

Helping others by donating

 

Don’t miss our companion blog-found here: Old Man Blog

Find us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/yeomalt

 

 

 

Photo-

Welcome Visitors

Rent yourself a State Parks buoy at Fort Worden

Voted best consumer value in weekend recreation.

 

DSC_0005_007

I worked for a full school year (2003-2004) as a lunchroom cashier at a Kitsap County junior high school.

Both my nieces have attended this school.

Students were not allowed to use the lockers which were purchased and installed when the school was built. I saw students coming through the lunch line with backpacks and- at times- musical instruments- holding a plate of chow and digging in a pocket for lunch money- the force of gravity pulling against their effort to behave in a business-like manner. I wondered why the items they were toting weren’t stored in school lockers.

My sense is that the lockers were off-limits because there was a potential for storage of unsafe or illegal items. If the lockers were off-limits for everyone, there would be no locker incidents during the school year.

The school I was at had a sheriff’s deputy on site, so they didn’t have to guess at appropriate security procedures, or go without law enforcement resources.

Banning the use of lockers meant not having to manage the use of lockers. Banning the use of lockers meant teaching students that good citizens and troublemakers are to be treated the same- thereby removing consequences and incentives for individual behavior.

The Message-

Learn the system students and parents- “Because I said so” is the way things are going to be around here. One size fits all- guilty until proven innocent- get used to it.

If I was Principal-

I would have a meeting with the school’s sheriff’s deputy to discuss my plan for use of the lockers- an asset provided to the school via tax dollars. The lockers create an opportunity to teach responsibility which can pay off later in life.

I would have a meeting with parents a few days prior to the beginning of each school year. I would say that we expect all of our students to be good citizens. Good citizens enjoy privileges and responsibilities like the use of school lockers. Good citizens will not give up their privileges because of the actions or potential actions of troublemakers. I would introduce the school’s sheriff’s deputy and indicate that his salary is being paid in order to maintain a professional and safe environment at the school. I would explain to parents that any student found to be misusing or storing illegal items in a locker- or using a locker in such a way as to risk the safety of others- would be dealt with swiftly, and that misbehavior in this area would not be tolerated. I would then take questions from parents.

On the first day of school each year, I would address all students and deliver the same message. I would let students know that the policy comes with one warning, and that they have each had their warning. I would then take questions from students.

Junior high students are smart. Treating them like second class citizens isn’t the right way to get them started.

P.S.- Why issue photo ID badges to school district employees if- wearing the badges is optional, and no spot checks are ever conducted to make sure the badge is matched with the person who is authorized to wear it? Security Theater.

Students are aware of the examples of leadership they are presented with.

Americans are winners- We expect a high standard.

 

 

Photo-

North Beach, Port Townsend

 

I worked as a lunch lady at an elementary school a few years back. My job was to wash dishes during and after lunch.

Lunch ladies work in a pretty fast paced job. Hours are cut back from time to time. It’s a good job for people who want to hustle.

Most of the lunch ladies have or have had kids or grandkids enrolled in the schools where they work.

One day, a small child who was having a difficult time came through the line. She was in tears for some reason. The lunch lady who was serving stopped what she was doing, went out in front of the serving line, got down at eye-level with the girl, said something nice to her & gave her a hug.

This is part of what I was missing out on during my 20 years in the USMC.

 

Photo- Port Townsend Ship Yard

 

 

 

I worked as a “lunch lady” at NKSD for 3 1/2 years. Great people to work with- they had their heart in the right place- they cared about the kids. They knew how to hustle.

We worked part time- average shift about 4 hours. We reported to work less than half the days in a calendar year (171). Unlike traditional food services jobs- we never worked nights, weekends or holidays. We were never on-call, etc. In many cases our job was to unpack and warm up frozen corn dogs, hot pockets, burritos, etc.

My dental plan was better as a lunch lady than it was after 20 years in the Marines.

We were in a union with full time- year round- workers who did things like get up on the roof in bad weather and work on electrical or ventilation equipment. The union always wanted better pay and benefits. The school district said they didn’t have any more money. As time went on some were put on split shifts. Lunchtime dishwasher jobs were eliminated. A good part time job came to an end.

If I wanted better pay and benefits I wouldn’t have taken a part time job with summers off, Christmas vacation, spring break, multiple long weekends, etc.